Film review: Submission

Stanley Tucci plays the lead as Professor Ted Swenson whose mind is filled with Altzschmerz. As you can gather from the title he becomes predictably becomes entwined with Addison Timlin’s character Angela Argo who shows great promise as a new literary voice in her draft of a novel called Eggs.

Excerpts from Eggs are read by Argo and are really wonderful to hear as she pull you in as the underdog with literary taste. In class we se her talent is not appreciated by her peers (partly as they’re not that bright and partly because she had recently given a damning review of one of her classmates.) It is only through the ear of Professor Swenson that Argo gets the recognition she deserves. 

“The room spun until it threw me onto the floor.” 

Argo writes “terribly obscene” poetry according to one professor who taught her. And sexual fantasies continue to weave into her newer work Eggs. Swenson generously accepts her request to read early chapters of the draft which we all know is begging to be role-played in reality. It begins fine enough but talks a walk into a path best untaken. The impending involvement feels unnecessary as the only point of attraction is Argo’s literary voice. The Professor is so starved of cerebral stimulus that the first exposure to it lures him into an inappropriate and unnecessary brief entanglement. It’s up to the viewer to wander if they saw any seduction or manipulation at play in the film. Your answer is very telling as to whether that last line made you think of Swenson or Argo.

The film unfolds predictably and it can be somewhat frustrating as you know it’s all so avoidable. Their bond is ultimately irrelevant and I saw it no physical or cerebral attachment seemed present. There was no romance, no seduction or rapport. Argo writes great prose. There’s the art and the person and the person (character) is not as appealing as her prose. Also the dynamic is completely inappropriate educators must never overstep the line with their connection to their students no matter what their age difference is or qualities that could be a foundation for a even a friendhsgoiip. Educators educate it is as simple as that. It doesn’t even matter if a student is infatuated with a professor, the educator always has to say no and draw a line and put a wall in place. 

I got to hear the word snafu in the film. That was a highlight. That was a word of the day for me. And helped distract me from the college hook-up witnessed mintues previously with nudity I didn’t expect to see. 

Near the end as Professor Swenson admits: he slept with her words. But it’s no excuse. Ted is just a fool. But I could not feel anything for him no annoyance or anger because again it just comes back to that word unnecessary. 

Professor Ted is pressured to write a memoir which he feels is a redundant medium as he explores much of his life in the guise of fiction. The whole brush with the forbidden is redundant. And I guess it goes back to the same lesson: damaged people are dangerous they know how to survive. It’s a shame because he has such a wonderful marriage which is a rare depiction in film. Later on his wife delivers some great lines near the end. 

Despite his brain being the source of his power his d*ck leads to his downfall. So I guess women are more powerful.

Addison Timlin is a wonderful actress. I had only previous to this seen her in a small part in Chronically Metropolitan but she carries the scenes well, is wonderfully engaging and her voice has a warm and soothing feel as she reads extracts of her novel. She is one the most pleasant film discoveries I’ve seen in a while. I’d really like to see her in more Indie films. Stanley Tucci is always great to watch and great to see in the central and leading role. 

Film review: Metropolitan

Metropolitan

Source

Doomed   |      Bourgeois      |        In Love

“Manhattan, Christmas Vacation, not so long ago…”

Oscar Nominated for Best Original Screenplay this film takes you into the lives of Manhattan’s elite. They’re young, beautiful yet doomed. A group of preppies sans Gossip girl overtones after all this was released before text messages even existed. It’s a nuanced debut film by Director and Screenwriter Whit Stillman.  Stillman made Serena a chic name in books, film and TV. He paved the way for beautiful and damned Manhattanites found in Cruel Intentions alongside Gossip Girl the book series and its eventual mega-hit TV show.

The film still above the original “you can’t sit with us” scene.

Meet the U.H.B. Urban Haute Bourgeoisie pronounced “Uhhb.”  You have Tom the auburn haired fellow with a penchant for socialism and is conflicted by his views on privilege to fully mingle with his new preppy friends. Audrey is in love with Tom, but he can’t get over Serena. The dark haired guy in the above photo is the dashingly witty Nick who serves the best lines:

“The Surrealists were just a bunch of social climbers.”

“Playing strip poker with an exhibitionist somehow takes the challenge away.”

“Rick Von Slonecker is tall, rich, good looking, stupid, dishonest, conceited, a bully, liar, drunk and thief, an egomaniac, and probably psychotic. In short, highly attractive to women.”

It’s a subtle plot. You are essentially spending the holidays in a W.A.S.P. way. There’s stimulating conversation and a foreboding of economic uncertainty present by the fact that even these privileged kids face the prospect of downward social mobility and that even these lucky kids see themselves as Charlie puts it “doomed.”

Tom Townsend once belonged, not to this particular set of friends but to their world: Prepdom.  Since his parents divorce he has lost his privileged access and lives as an ‘outsider’ in Upper West Side. Though he’s in love with the resident Preppy It Girl Serena Slocum, who is with Baron Von Sloneker who Nick detests and labels titled Aristocrats as “scum of the earth.”

Tom kind of annoys me: “I don’t read novels I prefer good literary criticism.”

Audrey is adorable and there’s not much revealed about Jane who looks like an American cousin of Nigella Lawson.

It’s witty, interesting and a traditional depiction of an extraordinary class. It’s delightful and there’s none of the stress and drama found in contemporary depictions of rich kids. You’ll either love it or you won’t. It’s an enjoyable film for those that get it.

 


Purchase the film on DVD 

More about Whit Stillman

whit_stillman

Twitter: @WhitStillman
IMDb profile

Other films by him:
The Last Days of Disco
Barcelona
Damsels in Distress